Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe. a Frame Analysis Approach
نویسنده
چکیده
Introduction Since Beijing 1995, gender mainstreaming has heralded the beginning of a renewed effort to address what is seen as one of the roots of gender inequality: the genderedness of systems, procedures and organizations. In the definition of the Council of Europe, gender mainstreaming is the (re)organisation, improvement, development and evaluation of policy processes, so that a gender equality perspective is incorporated in all policies at all levels and at all stages, by the actors normally involved in policymaking. All member states and some candidate states of the European Union have started to implement gender mainstreaming. The 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam places equality between women and men among the explicit tasks of the European Union and obliges the EU to promote gender equality in all its tasks and activities. The Gender Mainstreaming approach that has been legitimated by this Treaty is backed by legislation and by positive action in favour of women (or the “under-represented sex”). Gender equality policies have not only been part and parcel of modernising action in the European Union, but can be expected to continue to be so (Rossili 2000). With regard to gender inequality, the EU has both a formal EU problem definition at the present time, and a formalised set of EU strategies. Problems in the implementation of gender equality policies abound, at both national and EU level. To give just one example, it took the Netherlands – usually very supportive of the EU –14 years to implement article 119 on Equal Pay (Van der Vleuten 2001). Moreover, it has been documented that overall EU action has run counter to its goal of gender equality. Overall EU action has weakened women’s social rights more seriously than men’s (Rossili 2000). The introduction of Gender Mainstreaming, the incorporation of gender and women’s concerns in all regular policymaking is meant to address precisely this problem of a contradiction between specific gender policies and regular EU policies. Yet, in the case of the Structural Funds, for instance, Gender Mainstreaming has been used to further reduce existing funds and incentives for gender equality (Rossili 2000). Against this backdrop, this paper will present an approach at studying divergences in policy frames around gender equality as one of the elements connected to implementation problems: the MAGEEQ project.
منابع مشابه
Promoting gender equality in partner countries – an evaluation of Sida’s mainstreaming strategy
Mainstreaming Gender Equality: Sida’s support for the promotion of gender equality in partner countries. Britha Mikkelsen, Ted Freeman, Bonnie Keller et al. Sida Evaluation 02/01. Background Equality between women and men has been on the agenda for development co-operation since the 1995 Beijing Conference on Women, where a majority of the world’s states recognized that gender equality is not o...
متن کاملContested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach
متن کامل
Civil Society and Gender Mainstreaming: Empirical Evidence and Theory-Building from Twelve Post-Conflict Countries 2005–15
— Using critical discourse analysis, this twelve-country study addresses a key lacuna by examining civil society perspectives on the implementation of the Participative Democratic Model (PDM) of gender mainstreaming in post-conflict states. The findings reveal specific data, transitional justice, and governance challenges in war-affected states as policy actors press for heightened attention to...
متن کاملGender Mainstreaming in Nordic Development Agencies Seventeen years after the Beijing Conference
The Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995, was critical in making gender equality a development goal and adopted gender-mainstreaming as its primary mechanism to achieve this. Effective implementation of gender-mainstreaming involves changing both the internal organization and the external operations of development agencies to ensure that gender is integrated throughout the ...
متن کاملParticipatory governance or deliberative disjuncture? Exploring the state–civil society policy nexus in the gender mainstreaming programmes of seven Middle Eastern states 2005–2015
To better understand why Middle Eastern states continue to languish at the bottom of world rankings on gender equality, this study presents critical discourse analysis of state and civil society organizations’ implementation of the Participative Democratic Model of gender mainstreaming. A requirement of the 1995 United Nations Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, the Participative Democ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004